Join free

All stories

Oakland · Police · Parks · Roads · Fri Oct 2

Grade D, score 42 of 100 · open the full fact check No independent confirmation yet

“16-Year-Old Murder Victim Identified 57 Years Later; Suspected Serial Killer Still Missing”

Headline as Claycord wrote it

Read it at Claycord

The full fact check1 outlet · Grade D
> THE MARTINEZ WIRE ▌SOURCE CHECK · OCT 2, 2026D42 / 100

Grade D · score 42/100

The story links no document and names one person or agency on the record.

Checked Fri Oct 2, 11:52 AM · 1 of 1 page read

Sources checked

No independent confirmation found yet.

The reporting

  1. “16-Year-Old Murder Victim Identified 57 Years Later; Suspected Serial Killer Still Missing”Claycord

coverage1 outlet

1 newsroom

Claycord

News report · CLAYCORD.com · Fri Oct 2, 8:01 AM

Source grade D42/100

“16-Year-Old Murder Victim Identified 57 Years Later; Suspected Serial Killer Still Missing”

Police in Oakland, working with the FBI, have identified a 16-year-old girl who was found murdered in an Oakland hotel 57 years ago, while the man suspected in her killing – and several others – has never been captured.

The opening, as Claycord wrote it

0 documents linked1 quote4 of 7 paragraphs say where facts came from

Read the full story at Claycord

How this was graded18.3 + 0 + 10 + 6 = 34.3 of 80 → 42/100 · Grade D
18.3
Sourcing · of 45
0
Corroboration · of 15
10
Headline · of 10
6
Transparency · of 10

Left out: Record match (nothing of that kind to count).

Comments

Comments go up at once and are checked automatically: no links but public records, no phone numbers, emails or street addresses, nothing hateful or threatening. Three reports from readers take a comment down. Leave the name empty to post as Reader and a short code.

    No comments yet.

    How the grading works

    The short version

    The Wire grades each article from what the page itself shows: whether its facts say where they came from, the public documents it links, the other outlets and sources that confirm the same story, whether its facts match the Wire's own public records, a calm headline, and a clear byline and date. The story takes its best-sourced telling's grade. The grade describes the page, never the people in it.

    The formulaGrade = 100 × points ÷ possibleA 85 · B 70 · C 55 · D 40

    Grade = 100 × points ÷ possibleeach article · 0 to 100

    Story = its best tellingA 85 · B 70 · C 55 · D 40 · F below 40

    45
    Sourcing · 25 for the share of facts that say where they came from, 0, 7 or 12 for none, one or two or more public documents linked, 0 to 8 for the people and agencies named on the record
    15
    Corroboration · 8 or 12 for one or two or more other outlets or sources confirming it, 3 more when one is official; 8 for a telling alone that links two or more documents
    20
    Record match · 20 × the key facts confirmed or matching the Wire's records ÷ the facts checked; left out when none could be checked
    10
    Headline · less for a question, capitals, an exclamation mark, a teaser or heated words
    10
    Transparency · a byline, a date, an update or correction note, the outlet's identity, the kind labelled
    This story's arithmeticone article graded
    OutletSCRHTScore
    Claycord18.30–10642

    18.3 + 0 + 10 + 6 = 34.3 of 80 → 42/100 · Grade D

    S sourcing · C corroboration · R record match · H headline · T transparency. A dash is a part left out.

    How it is checked6 rules
    • Every input is read by rules from the page itself; the arithmetic is shown for every article.
    • An article that names no source, links no document and names no one on the record says "No sources cited", and its grade is at most D.
    • Where the Wire's own records hold the fact (a vote, a meeting, an amount, a call, a listing), the story and the record are set side by side; a vote the record tells differently holds the grade at most at D.
    • An agency's own release is the record itself and is not graded; an outlet that prints it as its story counts once.
    • Each story's key facts are checked for independent confirmation: first by rules against the Wire's records and the agencies' own releases, then each morning by research. A confirmation counts only when the Wire read the source's page itself and found the sentence on it; a government page, a public record or another newsroom's own reporting, never a copy of the story or a social post. A source that tells a fact differently is shown beside the story.
    • A page the Wire cannot read is never guessed at: it shows only its own headline, quoted, and is not graded.
    Sources1 records
    1. News reportFri Oct 2ClaycordRead